The US has a bold plan to bring peace to Gaza, but it's a delicate dance with potential pitfalls. The proposal, part of Donald Trump's ambitious vision, suggests an international stabilisation force until 2027, but will it work? Here's the catch: the plan hinges on a UN resolution, and not everyone is on board.
The draft, shared by the US, envisions a force to demilitarise Gaza and disarm non-state armed groups, including Hamas. Yet, Hamas hasn't committed to disarmament, leaving a crucial question unanswered. The force would also secure borders, coordinate aid, and work with a temporary 'Board of Peace' to govern the territory. But here's where it gets controversial—the US needs China and Russia's support, two permanent council members who might not play ball.
Arab nations, keen to contribute troops, insist on UN backing. UN Secretary-General Guterres agrees, emphasizing the need for a Security Council mandate. Meanwhile, the UK's Middle East minister, Falconer, focuses on maintaining the ceasefire and aid flow, with phase two of Trump's plan still unclear.
In a positive development, the remains of another hostage were returned to Israel, a step forward in the US-brokered ceasefire. However, the process is slow, with Israel pushing for faster returns and Hamas citing challenges. The war, sparked by a Hamas attack in 2023, has been devastating, with over 68,800 Palestinian deaths in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry. Israel disputes these figures, denying genocide accusations.
So, will the UN approve the resolution? Can Hamas be convinced to disarm? The world watches as this complex situation unfolds, leaving many questions hanging in the balance.
